System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are provided for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting. Credit dispute resolution requests may be received, processed, and sent to a credit bureau for submission to creditors. Status of credit dispute resolutions may be reported to consumers. If a creditor&#39;s response time is longer than its average response time or if a creditor does not respond to a credit dispute resolution request within a regulatory response period, alerts and reports may be sent to consumers to provide consumers with further options.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All applications for which a priority claim is identified in theApplication Data Sheet as filed with the present application are herebyincorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.

LIMITED COPYRIGHT AUTHORIZATION

A portion of disclosure of this patent document includes material whichis subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objectionto the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or thepatent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Officepatent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrightswhatsoever.

BACKGROUND

Credit disputes may arise when a consumer does not agree with a creditorregarding charges, timeliness of payments, fraudulent activities, and soforth. Credit disputes may also arise if a consumer believes thatinformation submitted by a creditor to a credit bureau is inaccurate ordoes not reflect the most current status of a credit situation.

A common type of credit dispute happens when a consumer's identity,including credit information, is stolen and used to make purchases orapply for credit lines. The consumer may inform a creditor that suchcharges are results of fraudulent activities, and as such the consumershould not be held responsible for them.

SUMMARY

Among other things, this disclosure describes systems and methods fortracking statuses of credit disputes, informing the status of creditdispute resolution to consumers, and informing consumers of whether acreditor has responded to a credit dispute resolution request within aregulatory response period.

As discussed herein, aspects of the present disclosure include a creditdispute resolution computer system. The computer system may include oneor more computer processors and a tangible storage device which stores acredit dispute resolution module configured for execution by the one ormore computer processors. The credit dispute resolution module may beconfigured to receive a credit dispute resolution request from aconsumer. In response to the request from the consumer for informationregarding resolution status of the credit dispute, the credit disputeresolution module may generate user interface code configured forexecution on a computing device of the consumer in order to render auser interface. The user interface may include a status interfaceincluding indicators of a plurality of required actions associated withresolution of the received credit dispute. The plurality of requiredactions may include at least: credit dispute request received, creditdispute case sent to credit bureau, credit dispute case acknowledged bycreditor and creditor replies to credit dispute request. The userinterface may also include a current status indicator indicating whichof the required action is in process at a time the request for theresolution status is received.

As described herein, aspects of the present disclosure include a creditdispute resolution computer system that includes one or more computerprocessors, a data storage configured to store a plurality of recordswhich includes credit disputes from respective consumers, and a trackingand reporting module. The tracking and reporting module may beconfigured to receive a request to resolve a credit dispute between aconsumer and a creditor and check the credit dispute for accuracy ofinformation in the credit dispute. The information may include one ormore of the consumer's name, address, social security number, one ormore accounts with the creditor, and/or payment information. Thetracking and reporting module may also send a credit dispute request toa credit bureau, receive one or more case status updates from the creditbureau regarding the credit dispute resolution request, determine aresolution status of a plurality of resolution statuses that applies tothe credit dispute of the consumer based on the received case status.The credit dispute resolution computer system may also include an alertmodule configured to notify the consumer of the determined resolutionstatus, notify the consumer of an average response time by the creditorand/or a regulatory response time requirement, and in response todetermining that no response has been received from the creditor withinthe regulatory response time, provide the consumer with information tohelp the consumer obtain a response from the creditor.

Aspects of the present disclosure include a computer-implemented methodfor credit dispute resolution. The computer-implemented method mayinclude receiving a credit dispute request from a consumer. Furthermore,in response to a request from the consumer for information regardingresolution status of the credit dispute, the computer-implemented methodmay determine a current status indicating which of a plurality ofrequired action is in process at a time the request for the resolutionrestates is received. The plurality of required actions may include atleast: credit dispute request received, credit dispute case sent to acredit bureau, credit dispute case acknowledged by creditor, andcreditor replies to credit dispute request. The computer-implementedmethod may also include determining an average response time for thecreditor based on one or more actual response times for the creditor incredit dispute requests of other consumers and a regulatory responsetime for the creditor to respond to the credit dispute case oncereceived by the creditor. The computer-implemented method may alsoinclude determining whether the creditor has responded to the creditdispute request within the regulatory response time.

Aspects of the present disclosure include a non-transitorycomputer-readable storage medium, which includes computer-executableinstructions that direct a computing system to receive a credit disputerequest from a consumer. In response to a request from the consumer forinformation regarding resolution status of the credit dispute, thecomputer-executable instructions may generate user interface codeconfigured for execution on a computing device of the consumer in orderto render a user interface. The user interface may include a statusinterface including indicators of a plurality of required actionsassociated with resolution of the received credit dispute. The pluralityof required actions may include at least: credit dispute requestreceived, credit dispute case sent to credit bureau, credit dispute caseacknowledged by creditor and creditor replies to credit dispute request.The user interface may also include a current status indicatorindicating which of the required actions is in process at a time therequest for the resolution status is received.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages will becomemore readily appreciated as the same become better understood byreference to the following detailed description, when taken inconjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of an illustrativeoperating environment for receiving, processing, monitoring, andreporting credit disputes and resolution of the credit disputes.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart that illustrates one embodiment of a method ofsending a credit dispute to a credit bureau and reporting the statusupdates of credit dispute resolution to a consumer.

FIG. 3 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes a credit dispute resolutionstatus monitoring interface indicating that a case has been sent to acredit bureau.

FIG. 4 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication of creditoraverage response times and regulatory creditor response times.

FIG. 5 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication that a case hasbeen successfully resolved and providing an option to provide resolutioninformation to other credit bureaus and/or credit dispute services.

FIG. 6 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication that a case hasnot been successfully resolved and providing options for potentiallyresolving the dispute.

FIG. 7 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication that that acreditor has not responded to the dispute within regulatory time frameand providing options for taking further actions.

FIG. 8 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which allows the consumer to submit asuccessfully resolved dispute to other credit bureaus and/or creditdispute services.

FIG. 9A-9C are illustrative user interfaces that include alerts and/ormessages that may be generated and presented to a consumer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments of systems, methods, processes, and data structureswill now be described with reference to the drawings. Variations to thesystems, methods, processes, and data structures which represent otherembodiments will also be described. Certain aspects, advantages, andnovel features of the systems, methods, processes, and data structuresare described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily allsuch advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particularembodiment. Accordingly, the systems, methods, processes, and/or datastructures may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves oneadvantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarilyachieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.

Credit disputes may arise when a consumer does not agree with a creditorregarding charges, timeliness of payments, fraudulent activities, and soforth. Credit disputes may also arise if a consumer believes thatinformation submitted by a creditor to a credit bureau is inaccurate ordoes not reflect the most current status of a credit situation.

A common type of credit dispute happens when a consumer's identity,including credit information, is stolen and used to make purchases orapply for credit lines. The consumer may inform a creditor that suchcharges are results of fraudulent activities, and as such the consumershould not be held responsible for them.

Other common credit disputes include whether payments are late, how muchfees and other charges are owed, whether merchants have overcharged,whether an interest rate is correct, and so forth.

Example Credit Reporting Environment and Data Flow

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of an illustrativeoperating environment 100 for receiving, processing, monitoring, andreporting credit disputes and resolution of the credit disputes. In theexample of FIG. 1, circled numerals illustrate the order in which dataflows between the various components according to one embodiment. Inother embodiments, the processes associated with the circled numeralsmay be performed in a different order, and the method may include feweror additional processes.

Consumer computer system 120 may include computer systems of individualconsumers who have individual credit accounts, businesses that havebusiness credit accounts, homeowners who have taken out loans or homeequity lines of credits, and/or consumers or businesses that havepurchased vehicles with loans, and so forth. As illustrated, theconsumer computer system 120 is in contact with the credit disputeresolution system 110 via a network 190.

In step 1 of FIG. 1, the credit dispute resolution system 110 receivesinformation related to a consumer's credit dispute from the consumercomputer system 120. For example, a consumer fills out a credit disputeform provided by the credit dispute resolution system, such as a formthat may be accessible via an online credit report of the consumer. Thecredit dispute resolution system 110 may also receive receipts, paymentstubs, proof of purchase, and/or other types of documents from theconsumer computer system 120.

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the credit dispute resolution system 120 isin contact with a credit bureau 150 and/or other provider of creditdata. In some embodiments, the credit dispute resolution system 120 maybe in contact with more than one credit bureaus 150 and/or creditdispute resolution services. In step 2 of FIG. 1, the credit disputeresolution system 120 sends information regarding the credit dispute tothe credit bureau 150. In some embodiments, the credit disputeinformation may include the received credit dispute from consumercomputer system 120, receipts, payment stubs, proof of purchase, and/ora standardized inquiry incorporating information related to the creditdispute formatted by the credit dispute resolution system. Theinformation may also include a request for the credit bureau 150 to sendstatus updates, status updates regarding the credit dispute, and resultof credit dispute resolution, an/or other updates. Furthermore, in someembodiments, the information may include user preferences for deliveryof status updates and/or alerts regarding the credit dispute.

The tracking and reporting module 103 may keep track of when creditdispute information is submitted to a credit bureau 150. The trackingand reporting module 103 may also receive, process, and/or store statusupdates regarding the submitted credit dispute. The tracking andreporting module 103 may also receive, process, and/or record how manydays have passed since a creditor has received a credit disputeresolution request.

In some embodiments, the alert module 101 generates alerts that may besent to the consumer. The alert module 101 may be in communication withthe tracking and reporting module 103. Based on the information and/orreports provided by the tracking and reporting module 103, the alertmodule 101 may inform the consumer computer system 120 of the recentupdates to the credit dispute. The alert module 101 may also sendmessages and/or emails and letters to the consumer. The alert module 101may also communicate with the I/O devices and interfaces 105 to generateone or more graphical interfaces in order to provide various statusesand alerts to the consumer, some of which are discussed in more detailsbelow.

In some embodiments, the credit dispute resolution system 110 alsocalculates an average response time for respective creditors. Forexample, the analysis module 108 may collect information regarding thecreditor 130, such as credit information associated with a plurality ofconsumers that each have filed disputes with the creditor, and calculatethe average number of days that that the particular creditor 130typically takes to respond to a credit dispute. Thus, the analysismodule 108 may determine average response times for individual creditorsbased on actual resolutions of (or failure to resolve) disputes withmultiple consumers. In some embodiments, the analysis module 108 mayperform a more detailed calculation, such as the average response timebased on the type of dispute (e.g., late payment, identity dispute, andso forth) or the average response time based on the type of creditinvolved (e.g., individual or business, interest rate categories).

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the credit bureau 150 is in contact withthe creditor 130 that is related to the credit dispute. In someembodiments, the credit bureau may be in contact with one or morecreditors that are related to the credit dispute. In some embodiments,the credit bureau 150 may send the credit dispute to the creditor 130along with a request that the creditor responds to the credit disputewithin a regulatory response time frame. In some embodiments, the creditbureau may verify the identity of the consumer and the past credithistory of the consumer specifically regarding the disputed creditaccount before sending the credit dispute to the creditor.

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the creditor 130 sends informationregarding the credit dispute to the credit bureau 150 and the creditbureau passes on some or all of the information to the credit disputeresolution system. In some embodiments, the credit dispute resolutionsystem 110 is under the control or and/or owed by the credit bureau 150.

Status messages provided by the creditor to the credit bureau mayinclude any combination of information regarding the dispute. Forexample, in some situations, the creditor 130 may inform the creditbureau 150 that it has tried to resolve the credit dispute but it cannotresolve it successfully after investigation. The creditor 130 may informthe credit bureau that a partial solution to the credit dispute may befound but there could be other requirements from the creditor to theconsumer. In some situations, the credit dispute may be successfullyresolved without further actions. In some situations, the creditor 130may inform the credit bureau 150 that more information or documents areneeded in order to further investigate the dispute. In some situations,the creditor 130 may not respond to the credit bureau 150 within theregulatory time frame, and the credit bureau 150 may inform the creditdispute resolution system 110 of the creditor's non-compliance with theregulatory time frame. The credit dispute resolution system 110 mayinform the consumer of the non-compliance, and in some embodiments, mayalso direct the consumer to take further actions, as discussed in moredetails below.

Example Methods Related to Incoming Credit Disputes

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a method of sendinga credit dispute to a credit bureau 150 and reporting the status updatesregarding credit dispute resolution to a consumer. The method of FIG. 2may be performed by the credit dispute resolution system 110, certainmodules of the system 110, and/or any other suitable computing system.Depending on the embodiment, the method of FIG. 2 may include fewer oradditional blocks and the blocks may be performed in an order that isdifferent than illustrated.

The method 200 begins at block 210, where the credit dispute resolutionsystem 110 receives a request to resolve a credit dispute between aconsumer and a creditor 130. As discussed above, the received creditdispute may include consumer credit data, business data, accounthistory, financial statements, public records, vehicle loan records,property information, mortgage information, and/or other types of data.The received data may include, for example, credit card payment historyof a consumer or a business, merchandise purchase information at astore, payment information regarding a home equity line of credit, andso forth. In some embodiments, the data may include data that the creditdispute resolution system 110 specifically requests from the consumercomputer system 120, such as proof of payment, proof of purchase, and soforth. The data may also include non-credit data which can be directlyor indirectly linked or tied to a consumer and/or business.

The method 200 proceeds to block 220, where the credit disputeresolution system 110 processes the received credit dispute information.In some embodiments, the credit dispute resolution system 110 may checkthe request for accuracy and completeness. For example, the creditdispute resolution system 110 may determine if the customer's name,address, and social security number match the one or more accounts thecustomer has with the creditor. In some embodiments, the credit disputeresolution system 110 may correct mistakes in the submitted information.For example, if the consumer has misspelled the name of the creditor,the credit dispute resolution system 110 may correct the mistake and/orask the consumer to correct the mistake. In some embodiments, theanalysis module 108 may determine, based on the submitted creditdispute, the category that the dispute falls into. For example, theanalysis module 108 may generally categorize the submitted creditdispute into disputes regarding incorrect identity-related information,identity theft, late or missed payments, interest rate disputes,fee/charge disputes, and so forth. In some embodiments, the categoryinformation may be part of the credit dispute information received fromthe consumer.

In some embodiments, if some key information, for example, the accountnumber of credit account in dispute, is missing or incorrect, the creditdispute resolution system may ask the consumer to provide moreinformation in order to complete the credit dispute resolution request.In some embodiments, if the missing or incorrect information may becompleted or corrected by the analysis module 108 based on theinformation stored in the mass storage device 107, then the analysismodule 108 may also automatically correct or complete the missinginformation.

The method 200 proceeds to block 230, where the credit disputeresolution system 110 processes the received credit dispute informationinto a credit dispute resolution request, and send the request to acredit bureau 150 (or multiple credit bureaus). The consumer may benotified when the request is sent to the credit bureau. In someembodiments, the credit dispute resolution system 110 may format thereceived credit dispute information into a credit dispute resolutionrequest. The formatting involved may include gathering the receivedcredit dispute information, extract data fields that involve theidentifying information about the consumer, dates of events, details ofthe dispute, and so forth. The extracted data may be different dependingon the type of credit dispute.

In some embodiments, the formatted credit dispute resolution request maybe in the form of a letter to the credit bureau. In some cases, theformatted credit dispute resolution request may be in the form of aseries of data fields that may be loaded into a database or other datastructure. In some other cases, the credit formatted credit disputeresolution request may be a pre-determined format, such as XML, Excel,etc.

The method 200 proceeds to block 240, where the credit disputeresolution system 110 notifies the consumer when the credit bureauacknowledges receipt of the credit dispute resolution request. Thecredit dispute resolution 110 may also update a case log, which isconfigured to reflect the updates to the credit dispute resolutionrequest. The alert module 108 may notify the consumer by a text message,an email, or by a message or a graphical indicator displayed to theconsumer when the consumer logs onto a portal provided by the disputeresolution system for tracking status of the submitted dispute.

The method 200 proceeds to block 250, where the credit disputeresolution system 100 may report a regulatory response time frame and anestimated creditor response time frame to the consumer. In someembodiments, a regulatory response time frame is the number of dayswithin which the creditor is required to respond to an inquiry by law.In some embodiments, analysis module 108 may determine the averagecreditor response time frame to the consumer based on information storedin the credit dispute resolution system 110 (such as in the mass storagedevice 107). In some embodiments, the regulatory response time frame maybe determined based on relevant state and Federal laws, such as Faircredit Reporting Act (FCRA). In some embodiments, the regulatoryresponse time frame may be 30 days.

The method 200 proceeds to decision block 260, where the credit disputeresolution system 110 determines whether the creditor has respondedwithin the regulatory time frame. For example, if the regulatoryresponse time frame is 30 days, then the credit dispute resolutionsystem 110 makes a determination whether the creditor has responded tothe credit dispute resolution request within 30 days. In someembodiments, in order to satisfy the regulatory response time frame, theresponse may be an initial response or acknowledgement with some statedfurther planed action from the creditor.

If the answer to the decision block 260 is no and the creditor has notresponded within the regulatory response time frame, then the creditdispute resolution system 110 proceed to bock 265. The credit disputeresolution system 110 may send a message to the consumer that thecreditor has not responded within the regulatory time frame, and/or sendfurther inquiries to the credit bureau. In some embodiments, the creditbureau may notify the creditor that a response should be submittedwithin the regulatory time frame. In a user interface provided to theconsumer, which will be described in detail later, a status message or astatus bar may also be shown to the consumer and let the consumer knowthat the creditor has not responded within the regulatory time frame.

If the creditor has responded within the regulatory time frame, themethod 200 proceeds to decision block 270, where the credit disputeresolution system 110 provides the creditor's response to the consumer.The response from the creditor may be provided by the consumer via thealert module 101. In some embodiments, the response may be provided byone or more of text messages, emails, letters, and/or phone calls. In auser interface provided to the consumer, which will be described indetail later, a status message or a status bar may also be shown to theconsumer and let the consumer know that the creditor has respondedwithin the regulatory time frame. Moreover, the response from thecreditor may also be displayed in the user interface.

In some embodiments the method includes blocks similar to blocks 260,265, and 270, but with reference to an expected time frame for theparticular creditor. For example, if a particular creditor is expectedto respond within 14 days (e.g., based on a 14-day average response timein hundreds or thousands of previous disputes), the dispute resolutionsystem may notify the consumer when the time period has lapsed without aresponse and/or communicate with the creditor in an attempt to expeditethe process.

The method 200 proceeds to decision block 280, where it is determinedwhether the dispute has been resolved. In some embodiments, the analysismodule 108 may analyze the received response from the creditor anddetermines whether the dispute has been resolved. In some otherembodiments, information regarding whether the dispute has been resolvedmay be received from either the creditor or the credit bureau. In otherembodiments, the dispute is not considered resolved until input from theconsumer indicates that the dispute has been resolved (e.g., regardlessof whether information from the creditor indicates that the dispute isresolved.

If the answer is no at block 280 in view of the dispute not beingresolved successfully, the method 200 proceeds to block 285, andprovides consumers further resolution options. In some embodiments, thecredit dispute resolution system 110 provides the consumers with directcontact information of the creditor and/or the credit bureau, such asphone numbers and/or email addresses. In some embodiments, the creditdispute resolution system 110 provides the consumers with a list ofoptions or alternatives to try. In some embodiments, the credit disputeresolution system 110 may inform the consumer to send more informationto the creditor or credit bureau.

The method 200 then proceeds to block 290, either after a determinationof successful resolution in block 280 or providing options to theconsumer at block 285. The credit dispute resolution system 110 mayupdate the case status log to reflect the resolution status (e.g.,successful or unsuccessful resolution and/or details regarding thedispute). The credit dispute resolution system 110 may also report theresolution to the consumer. In some embodiments, the credit disputeresolution system 110 closes the credit dispute resolution request afterreceiving the indication of successful resolution form the creditor.

In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the method 200 proceeds to decision block293, where it is determined if the consumer would like to contact othercredit bureaus or credit dispute resolution services. If the answer isyes, then the method 200 proceeds to block 295, and the credit disputeresolution system 110 may help the consumer contact other creditbureaus. In some embodiments, the credit dispute resolution system 110may send information to other credit bureaus and/or credit disputeresolution services that may be useful to resolve other potentialdiscrepancies in the consumer's financial data maintained by those otherentities. The transmitted information may include, for example, theconsumer's credit dispute resolution request, the consumer's ID data,the consumer's other necessary credit data, the results of theresolution, and/or any other details regarding the dispute.

After the credit dispute resolution system 110 has finished performingany actions in block 295, or if the answer to the question in decisionblock 293 is no (that the consumer does not what to contact other creditbureaus or services), then the method 200 may proceed to block 297 andends the process.

Example User Interfaces and Status Blocks

FIG. 3 is an illustrative user interface that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes a credit dispute resolutionstatus monitoring interface 300 indicating a case has been sent to acredit bureau.

The interface 300 may display the consumer's identification information.In this particular example, the consumer's name and address aredisplayed. In other embodiments, the consumer's phone number, birthdate, and/or the last few digits of the consumer's social securitynumber may also be displayed.

The interface 300 may also display the complete or partial accountnumber of the account that is involved in this credit dispute. In someembodiments, the balance of the account, and the contact information ofthe creditor may also be displayed.

The interface 300 may display the status of the credit disputeresolution request. For example, in FIG. 3, the case status is shown as“submitted.” More details about the status may be displayed in thestatus bar 305 below. Several blocks representing the process of disputeresolution may be arranged to display the case status to the consumer.For example, in the interface 300, an arrow points to the block 320 ofthe status bar 305, which shows that the case has been sent to thecredit bureau. The arrow with the words “You are here” may be used topoint to the block most closely associated with a current status of theconsumer's credit dispute. In the interface 300, block 310 indicatesthat the case has been submitted to the credit dispute resolutionsystem, block 315 indicates that an accuracy check of the submittedcredit dispute has been completed, block 325 indicates that the creditorhas acknowledged receipt of the dispute, block 330 indicates that thecreditor should be responding to the system, and block 335 shows thatthe dispute has been closed. In other embodiments, fewer and/oradditional blocks may be included to illustrate fewer and/or additionalstatus associated with a credit dispute resolution process.Advantageously, the consumer not only sees the current status of theircredit dispute resolution process, which may be updated in realtime, theconsumer also sees the steps that have already been completely and knowswhat additional steps are required before the case is close. Withreference to the example of FIG. 3, the consumer can see that a coupleof actions (those associated with blocks 325 and 33) remain before thecase is closes at block 335.

In some embodiments, a link 340 may be provided in the interface 300. InFIG. 3, for example, if the consumer follows the link 340, the consumermay view the file summarizing the credit dispute, such as documents thatwere submitted to the credit bureau and/or documents sent to/from thecreditor.

FIG. 4 is an illustrative user interface 400 that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication of creditoraverage response times and regulatory creditor response times. Similarto the illustrative interface in FIG. 3, the interface 400 may displaythe consumer's identification information.

In FIG. 4, the case status is shown as “submitted.” More details aboutthe status may be displayed in the status bar 405 below. For example, inthe interface 400, a status arrow points to block 330 of the status bar405, which shows that the case has been acknowledged by the creditor andthe creditor should be responding to the system. In this embodiment, thestatus is determined based on the location of the status arrow below thestatus bar 405 (labeled “YOU ARE HERE”), which generally indicates thattasks to the left of the arrow have been completed and the task that thearrow is pointing to is in process. In this example, a message is shownnext to “You are here,” which indicates when a creditor usually respondsto a credit dispute resolution request, how long the request has beensubmitted to the creditor, and the regulatory response timeline. Inother embodiments, less or additional information may be displayed. Forexample, dates when be displayed next to each task to indicate when itwas started, completed, and/or expected to be completed. In thisexample, the displayed message indicates that Big Creditor typicallyresponds to credit disputes within 23 days, the particular consumer casewas submitted to Big Creditor 17 days ago, and, by law, Big Creditor isrequired to respond within 30 days.

In some embodiments of FIG. 4, a second status bar 490 with additionalblocks can be displayed to provide additional details regarding one ormore blocks of the status bar 405. In this example, the second statusbar 490 may include a block 450 indicating a creditor's average responsetime and a block 460 indicating an additional time (beyond thecreditor's average response time) until a regulatory response deadlineis reached. An indicator 455 may indicate where today is in view of thecreditor's average response time 450 and the regulatory response time460.

In some embodiments, a link 440 may be provided in the interface 400. InFIG. 4, for example, if the consumer follows the link 440, the consumermay view information regarding Big Creditor's response time, such as amessage, a file, and/or a webpage of statistics of a creditor's averageresponse time. The creditor's average response time and historicalaverage response time may be displayed as a graph and/or a chart. Theamount of time that has passed since the creditor has received a currentcredit dispute resolution request may also be compared to the creditor'saverage response time and historical average response time. In someembodiments, probabilities of whether a creditor may respond within somenumber of days may also be provided. In other embodiments, fewer and/oradditional blocks may be included to illustrate fewer and/or additionalstatus associated with a credit dispute resolution process.

FIG. 5 is an illustrative user interface 500 that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication that a case hasbeen successfully resolved and providing an option to provide resolutioninformation to the credit bureaus and/or credit dispute services.

In FIG. 5, the case status is shown as “resolved.” In this example, thestatus arrow (below the status bar 505) points to the end of block 330and the beginning of block 535 of the status bar 505, indicating that acreditor has already responded to the credit bureaus regarding thedispute, and the next step may be to send the resolved dispute to othercredit bureaus and close the case.

As with FIG. 4, the status arrow with the words “You are here” may beused to point to the block most closely associated with a current statusof the consumer's credit dispute. In this example, the message shownnext to the status arrow indicates that the case “has been successfullyresolved as of today.” Moreover, the user interface 500 may provide alink 540, which would allow the consumer to submit the resolved requestto other credit bureaus, should the consumer choose to.

In some embodiments of FIG. 5, a second status bar 590 with additionalblocks can be displayed around a particular block. In this example, thesecond status bar 590 may include a block 450 indicating Big Creditor'saverage response time and a block 460 indicating regulatory responsetime 460 (beyond Big Creditor's average response time). An indicator 455may indicate where today is in view of Big Creditor's average responsetime 450 and the regulatory response time 460. In this example,indicator 455 shows that Big Creditor in this example has taken longerthan its average response time to respond to this credit disputeresolution request but the time Big Creditor has taken is still withinthe regulatory required response time. In other embodiments, fewerand/or additional blocks may be included to illustrate fewer and/oradditional status associated with a credit dispute resolution process.

FIG. 6 is an illustrative user interface 600 that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication that a case hasnot been successfully resolved and providing options for potentiallyresolving the dispute.

In FIG. 6, the case status is shown as “denied.” In this example, thestatus arrow points to the end of block 330 and the beginning of block635 of the status bar 605, showing that Big Creditor has alreadyresponded to the system but the credit dispute resolution request wasdenied. In this example, the next step may be to explore availableoptions, if any, as shown in block 635.

In this example, the message shown next to the status arrow indicatesthat Big Creditor has responded to the consumer's inquiries but refusedto remove the disputed late payments from the consumer's credit history.Moreover, the user interface 600 may provide a link 640, which wouldallow the consumer to explore further options, if available.

The further options may include, for example, identifying the reason (ifany) a creditor has refused to resolve the dispute, identifying anyadditional support documents that were not presented in order to helpresolve the dispute, providing contact information of credit disputeresolution services, placing phone calls on the consumer's behalf, andso forth. The credit dispute resolution system 110 may identify possibleadditional support documents that were not presented by comparing thelist of documents submitted by a consumer whose dispute resolutionrequest was denied against typical documents submitted by consumers whohad similar but successfully resolved requests. For example, typicaldocuments submitted by consumers who had similar but successfullyresolved requests may include proof of income, proof of employment,proof of payment, proof of other sources of income, and so forth.

In other embodiments, fewer and/or additional blocks may be included toillustrate fewer and/or additional status associated with a creditdispute resolution process.

FIG. 7 is an illustrative user interface 700 that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which includes an indication that a creditorhas not responded to the dispute within regulatory time frame andproviding options for taking further actions.

In FIG. 7, the case status is shown as “no response.” In this example,the status arrow points to the end of block 330 and the beginning ofblock 635 of the status block 705, indicating that Big Creditor has notresponded to the system within the regulatory response time. The nextstep may be to explore further options.

A second status bar 790 with additional blocks can be displayed around aparticular block. In this example, the second status bar 790 may includea block 450 indicating Big Creditor's average response time and a block460 indicating regulatory response time (beyond Big Creditor's averageresponse time).

An indicator 455 may indicate where today (e.g., the day the consumeraccesses the user interface 700) is in view of the creditor's averageresponse time 450 and the regulatory response time 460. In this example,indicator 455 shows that Big Creditor has taken longer than its averageresponse time to respond to this credit dispute resolution request.Moreover, indicator 455 also shows that Big Creditor has not respondedwithin the regulatory required response time.

In this example, the message shown next to the status arrow indicatesthat Big Creditor has not responded to the consumer's inquiries withinthe regulatory required response time. Moreover, the user interface 700may provide a link 740, which would allow the consumer to explorefurther options, if available. The options available may include, forexample, documents, links, and contact information related to federal,state, and/or other regulations of consumer credit disputes, and soforth. The options may also include an automatic form letter generationtool that enables the consumer to generate a letter. The letter mayinclude the credit dispute, the consumer's information, accountinformation, the history of consumer's credit dispute resolutionrequest, and/or other relevant information. In other embodiments, fewerand/or additional blocks may be included to illustrate fewer and/oradditional status associated with a credit dispute resolution process.

FIG. 8 is an illustrative user interface 800 that may be generated andpresented to a consumer, which allows the consumer to submit asuccessfully resolved dispute to other credit bureaus and/or creditdispute services.

The example user interface 800 lists two credit bureaus, 805 and 810,which represents Credit Bureau 1 and Credit Bureau 2, respectively, arepresented to a consumer. By choosing the credit bureaus and/or creditdispute services, the consumer's credit dispute resolution requestand/or other relevant information may be submitted to the chosen creditbureaus and/or credit dispute services. In other embodiments, fewerand/or additional credit bureaus and/or credit dispute services may beincluded. In one embodiment, the credit dispute resolution systemautomatically transmits the dispute resolution information directly tothe selected credit bureaus, without further involvement from theconsumer. In other embodiments, the credit dispute resolution systemprovides template letters and/or other documents that may be sent (bymail, fax, email, etc.) by the consumer to the other credit bureaus.Advantageously, such documents may be used to simplify the process ofupdating information regarding the dispute at the other credit bureaus.In other embodiments, the credit dispute resolution system interfacesdirectly with multiple credit bureau such that transmission of creditdispute resolution information is seamlessly provided to the multiplecredit bureaus.

All of the user interfaces discussed above, such as those in FIGS. 4-8,may also be modified for display on mobile devices, such as smart phonesor tablets. For example, the user interface of FIG. 4 may be parsed intomultiple screens for better display on a smaller screen. However, thesame and/or similar functionality that is discussed above may also beincluded in applications and/or websites for display on mobile devices.

FIGS. 9A-9C include alerts and/or messages that may be generated andpresented to a consumer. In FIG. 9A, a mobile user interface 903 isshown. The mobile user interface 903 in this example includes twomessages/alerts. Message/alert 905 informs a consumer that theconsumer's case has been submitted to Credit Bureau 1. The mobile userinterface 910 informs a consumer that Big Creditor acknowledged receiptof the consumer's case on Jan. 21, 2013.

Depending on the embodiment, the user may have options to specify thatalerts are sent when the consumer's dispute resolution case has movedfrom one of block to another (e.g. the blocks in the status bars ofFIGS. 5-8). Alternatively, the consumer may wish to receive alerts onlywhen certain activities have occurred, such as when the dispute has beensubmitted to the credit Bureau and/or when the creditor has notresponded to a submitted dispute within the expected timeframe and/orthe regulatory time frame.

Depending on the embodiment, the consumer may set preferences fordelivery of alerts any available manner, such as via text messages,email, telephone call, smart phone application, etc. In someembodiments, alerts may include links to further information regardingthe consumer's dispute. For example, in embodiment of FIG. 9A theconsumer may click on the dispute resolution link in either messages 905or 910 in order to navigate to a webpage that displays the creditdispute timeline, such as is illustrated in FIGS. 4-8.

In FIG. 9B, a mobile user interface 912 is shown. The mobile userinterface 915 in this example includes a message/alert 915, which showsthat Big Creditor has asked for proof of a consumer's payment. Themessage/alert also asks the consumer to submit a copy of his or herpayment on Dec. 4, 2012 to the credit dispute resolution system'swebsite. In this embodiment, the user interface 912 may include a linkthat takes the consumer directly to a form that may be filled out inorder to provide big creditor with the requested proof of payment. Linksto other related information may also be included.

In FIG. 9C, a user interface 920 is shown. In this embodiment, the userinterface 920 includes an e-mail sent from the credit dispute resolutionsystem to a consumer. The e-mail in this example informs the consumerthat his case has been submitted to Big Creditor for 30 days. However,Big Creditor has not responded. Because Big Creditor is required, inthis particular example, to respond within a 30-day regulatory requiredtime frame, the consumer is recommended to take some following actions.

In some embodiments, a link 925 may be provided to a consumer whichincludes information regarding recommended actions when creditors do notrespond. In some cases, such information may be included in the e-mail.The recommended actions when creditors do not respond may include, forexample, re-submitting the credit dispute resolution request, and/orproviding statistics on how often the creditor may respond whencontacted again after not responding at first, and so forth.

Other Embodiments

Although the foregoing systems and methods have been described in termsof certain embodiments, other embodiments will be apparent to those ofordinary skill in the art from the disclosure herein. Additionally,other combinations, omissions, substitutions and modifications will beapparent to the skilled artisan in view of the disclosure herein. Whilesome embodiments of the inventions have been described, theseembodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are notintended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel methodsand systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other formswithout departing from the spirit thereof. Further, the disclosureherein of any particular feature, aspect, method, property,characteristic, quality, attribute, element, or the like in connectionwith an embodiment can be used in all other embodiments set forthherein.

All of the processes described herein may be embodied in, and fullyautomated via, software code modules executed by one or more generalpurpose computers or processors. The code modules may be stored in anytype of computer-readable medium or other computer storage device. Someor all the methods may alternatively be embodied in specialized computerhardware. In addition, the components referred to herein may beimplemented in hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof.

Conditional language such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might” or“may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, are otherwise understoodwithin the context as used in general to convey that certain embodimentsinclude, while other embodiments do not include, certain features,elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generallyintended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any wayrequired for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodimentsnecessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input orprompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included orare to be performed in any particular embodiment.

Any process descriptions, elements or blocks in the flow diagramsdescribed herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should beunderstood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions ofcode which include one or more executable instructions for implementingspecific logical functions or elements in the process. Alternateimplementations are included within the scope of the embodimentsdescribed herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executedout of order from that shown, or discussed, including substantiallyconcurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionalityinvolved as would be understood by those skilled in the art.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computing system comprising: a computerreadable storage medium having executable instructions stored thereon;and one or more processors configured to execute the executableinstructions to cause the computing system to: determine an update on astatus for a credit dispute request, wherein the credit dispute requestis a request to dispute an item on a credit report of a user; receive arequest to access information regarding the credit dispute request; andin response to receiving the request to access information regarding thecredit dispute request: generate user interface data usable forrendering a user interface, wherein the user interface includes a firstindicator that indicates the update on the status of the credit disputerequest, wherein the first indicator comprises a graphical icon, and thefirst indicator is positioned in the user interface relative to aplurality of visual representations that are arranged relative to eachother in a manner corresponding to a chronological order of stagesassociated with the credit dispute request; and cause transmission, overa wired or wireless electronic communication channel, of at least theuser interface data to an electronic device of the user, wherein theelectronic device of the user is configured to render and display a userinterface based at least in part on the user interface data.
 2. Thecomputing system of claim 1, wherein the update to the status isselected from a plurality of possible statuses in the credit disputerequest.
 3. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the executableinstructions further cause the computing system to generate another userinterface for rendering a status of the credit dispute request prior tothe update.
 4. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the generatingthe user interface data and causing transmission is further in responseto a user preference for receiving an alert.
 5. The computing system ofclaim 1, wherein the transmission further includes transmitting theupdate to one or more credit bureaus to resolve discrepancies at the oneor more credit bureaus.
 6. The computing system of claim 1, wherein thetransmission further includes transmitting the update to a plurality ofcredit bureaus to resolve discrepancies at the plurality of creditbureaus.
 7. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the user interfacedata further comprises a status bar indicating an average response timefor a creditor related to the dispute and a regulatory responsedeadline.
 8. The computing system of claim 7, wherein the status barfurther includes an indication of a current time with relation to theaverage response time and/or the regulatory response deadline.
 9. Acomputer-implemented method for credit dispute resolution, thecomputer-implemented method comprising: determining an update on astatus for a credit dispute request, wherein the credit dispute requestis a request to dispute an item on a credit report of a user; receivinga request to access information regarding the credit dispute request;and in response to receiving the request to access information regardingthe credit dispute request: generating user interface data usable forrendering a user interface, wherein the user interface includes a firstindicator that indicates the update on the status of the credit disputerequest, wherein the first indicator comprises a graphical icon, and thefirst indicator is positioned in the user interface relative to aplurality of visual representations that are arranged relative to eachother in a manner corresponding to a chronological order of stagesassociated with the credit dispute request; and causing transmission,over a wired or wireless electronic communication channel, of at leastthe user interface data to an electronic device of the user, wherein theelectronic device of the user is configured to render and display a userinterface based at least in part on the user interface data.
 10. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the request to accessthe information regarding the credit dispute request is received via aselectable link that is provided as part of an electronic alert thatalso includes an indication of the status of the credit dispute request.11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10, further comprising: inresponse to determining the update to the status of the credit disputerequest: generate the electronic alert including the indication of thecurrent or updated status of the credit dispute request and theselectable link; and causing transmission of the electronic alert to theelectronic device of the user associated with the credit disputerequest.
 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein thevisual representations are arranged horizontally as a timeline.
 13. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the user interfaceprovides an option for the user to provide documents associated with thecredit dispute request.
 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 9,wherein the update to the status indicates respective actions related tothe credit dispute request, wherein the actions include at least one of:credit dispute request received, credit dispute case sent to creditbureau, credit dispute case acknowledged by a creditor, or the creditorreplies to credit dispute request.
 15. The computer-implemented methodof claim 9, wherein the user interface further includes at least one of:a calculated average response time associated with a creditor associatedwith the credit dispute request, a calculated probability that thecreditor will respond to the credit dispute request within thecalculated average response time, a determined elapsed time periodassociated with the credit dispute request, a regulatory response timeperiod for the creditor to respond to the credit dispute request, avisual indication of whether the determined elapsed time period islarger than the calculated average response time, an average responsetime associated with the creditor for a type of dispute, or an option toinitiate automatic submission of the credit dispute request to one ormore additional credit bureaus.
 16. A non-transitory computer storagemedium which stores a client application comprising executable code, theexecutable code causing a computing device to perform operations thatcomprise at least: determining an update on a status for a creditdispute request, wherein the credit dispute request is a request todispute an item on a credit report of a user; receiving a request toaccess information regarding the credit dispute request; and in responseto receiving the request to access information regarding the creditdispute request: generating user interface data usable for rendering auser interface, wherein the user interface includes a first indicatorthat indicates the update on the status of the credit dispute request,wherein the first indicator comprises a graphical icon, and the firstindicator is positioned in the user interface relative to a plurality ofvisual representations that are arranged relative to each other in amanner corresponding to a chronological order of stages associated withthe credit dispute request; and causing transmission, over a wired orwireless electronic communication channel, of at least the userinterface data to an electronic device of the user, wherein theelectronic device of the user is configured to render and display a userinterface based at least in part on the user interface data.
 17. Thenon-transitory computer storage medium of claim 16, the operationsfurther comprising: determining an average response time for a creditorrelated to the dispute based on one or more actual response times forthe creditor in credit dispute requests of other users.
 18. Thenon-transitory computer storage medium of claim 16, the operationsfurther comprising: determining a difference between a total number ofdays since the credit dispute request has been submitted to a creditorrelated to the dispute and a regulatory response time requirement. 19.The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 18, wherein the userinterface further includes: an indication of the difference; and anindication of whether the total number of days since the credit disputerequest has been submitted to the creditor has exceeded the regulatoryresponse time requirement.
 20. The non-transitory computer storagemedium of claim 19, wherein the user interface further includes agraphical indicator of a number of days that the regulatory responsetime requirement has been exceeded.